Attention FAE Customers:
Please be aware that NASBA credits are awarded based on whether the events are webcast or in-person, as well as on the number of CPE credits.
Please check the event registration page to see if NASBA credits are being awarded for the programs you select.

Federal Taxation

  • IRS to Stop Automatically Assessed 3520 Late Filing Penalty on Large Foreign Gifts

    By:
    Melissa Gillespie, Esq., MST, CPA
    |
    Dec 1, 2024

    At the end of October 2024, the IRS announced that it will no longer automatically assess penalties for late reporting of large foreign gifts. Before assessing a penalty, the IRS will now review reasonable cause statements submitted with late-filed Form 3520, which reports gifts or bequests from foreign persons, to determine whether a penalty should be imposed.

  • Estate of Fields v. Comm’r—Bad Facts Family Limited Partnership Causes Estate Tax Inclusion under IRC Section 2036(a)(1) and (2) with Accuracy-Related Penalty Imposed

    By:
    Kevin Matz, CPA, JD, LLM
    |
    Dec 1, 2024

    Estate of Fields v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2024-90 (Sept. 26, 2024) (Copeland, J.), provides a textbook example of a “bad facts” family limited partnership (FLP) that caused estate tax inclusion of the property transferred to the FLP under both sections 2036(a)(1) and (2) with loss of discounts for lack of control and lack of marketability. In doing so, the court applied the Tax Court’s 2017 holding in Estate of Powell v. Commissioner, 148 T.C. 392 (2017)—that the ability of the decedent as a limited partner to join together with other partners to liquidate the FLP constitutes a section 2036(a)(2) estate tax trigger—and raises the specter of accuracy-related penalties that may loom where section 2036 applies.

  • SCOTUS Addresses Constitutional Challenge to Mandatory Repatriation Tax

    By:
    Gary Forester, JD, LLM
    |
    Dec 1, 2024

    In Moore v. U.S. (36 F. 4th 930), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on a constitutional challenge of IRC section 965, the mandatory repatriation tax (MRT). The MRT is a one-time repatriation tax (or “deemed dividend”) that passes through undistributed accumulated income of U.S.-controlled foreign corporations (CFCs). Section 965 is part of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (P.L. 115-97), which addresses foreign business earnings, including CFCs, inversions and the GILTI tax. The Act generally taxes U.S. shareholders owning 10% or more of a foreign corporation on otherwise tax-deferred foreign earnings.

  • The Sunset of the Doubled Estate, Gift, and GST Tax Exclusion Amounts after December 31, 2025 – What High Net Worth Individuals and Family Offices Need to Know About It

    By:
    Lucy D. Bickford and Kevin Matz, CPA, JD, LLM
    |
    Nov 1, 2024
    In the world of high-net-worth individuals and their financial advisors, the sunset of certain provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) is a topic of intense discussion. The TCJA significantly increased the lifetime gift and estate tax exclusion and the generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax exemption. 
  • Charitable Planning for Individuals

    By:
    Sahri Zeger, JD
    |
    Oct 1, 2024

    Charitable contributions play a crucial role in addressing important needs within our communities, and the U.S. tax code recognizes their value by providing various incentives. By understanding tax strategies related to charitable giving, individuals can maximize their impact while also receiving significant tax advantages. This article will discuss some lesser-known aspects of direct charitable giving and common charitable planning strategies using trusts.

  • The U.S. Supreme Court Affirms the Eighth Circuit’s Decision in Favor of the Government Concerning the Estate Tax Treatment of Life Insurance Proceeds Used to Fund a Corporate Redemption Obligation

    By:
    Kevin Matz, CPA, JD, LLM
    |
    Aug 1, 2024
    In Connelly v. U.S., 602 U.S. ___ (6/6/2024), the United States Supreme Court affirmed a decision of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in favor of the government concerning the estate tax treatment of life insurance proceeds that are used to fund a corporate redemption obligation under a buy-sell agreement. The specific question presented was whether, in determining the fair market value of the corporate shares, there should be any offset to take into account the redemption obligation to the decedent’s estate under a buy-sell agreement. 
  • Penalties in Modern Tax Practice

    By:
    Melissa Wiley
    |
    Jun 3, 2024

    “In 1955, there were approximately 14 penalty provisions in the Internal Revenue Code. There are now [in 2011] more than ten times that number.”  Internal Revenue Manual (“IRM”) part 20.1.1.1.1.

    Whenever I am asked why it is that I speak so often about penalties, I highlight the above quote from the IRS’s employee handbook. Whereas there were 14 penalty provisions in 1955, approximately 150 were listed by 2011; there are even more now, 13 years later.
 

 
Views expressed in articles published in Tax Stringer are the authors' only and are not to be attributed to the publication, its editors, the NYSSCPA or FAE, or their directors, officers, or employees, unless expressly so stated. Articles contain information believed by the authors to be accurate, but the publisher, editors and authors are not engaged in redering legal, accounting or other professional services. If specific professional advice or assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.